Project meeting
- Ocg. 6, 2010 at LBNL, briefly followed by ANI review meeting
- Attendees: Dimitrios Katramatos, Dantong Yu, Arie Shoshani, Alex Sim
- Notes
- Data transfers can be a separate entity, independent from the SRM.
- SRM may not be needed for the reserved data transfer with qualify of service.
- Negotiation is out of band. This is through the BeStMan interface, piggy back on the existing SRM message passing.
- How do we handle the LAN without the TeraPaths?
- In ORNL, there will be a static network circuit that can be setup as requests.
- SRM might need to directly talk to OSCARS or non-TeraPaths LAN provisioning systems.
- One way to handle the Quality of Service is via over-provisioning.
- When you are funded by DOE, you have to consider complex and heterogeneous sites that is different from your own sites.
- University of Michigan: will not run OSCARS, and not officially DOE Network supported site. We will replace U Michigan with LBNL or a site on ESnet.
- Year 1 Accomplishments
- LBNL Accomplishments
- Coordination and management of the end-to-end storage resource and bandwidth reservation
- Coordination with network resource provisioning service (TeraPaths) for advanced network reservations
- Management of the negotiated end-to-end storage and network resources
- BNL Accomplishments
- Design and implementation of intelligent multi-domain bandwidth allocation algorithms
- Management of the end-to-end network resource negotiation and configuration
- Summarize of the year 2 plan
- Decouple the SRM/GridFtp.
- Replace the TeraPaths with ESCPS
- Bundle GridFTP with the generic co-scheduler that is stripped down from SRM/BeStMan
- Testbed in LBNL
- Whiteboard notes